论文部分内容阅读
本文首先采用三个标准对演化经济学和演化经济学家做了划分:1.本体论标准:是否接纳新事象;2.方法论标准:接受还是反对还原论;3.隐喻标准:是否广泛地使用生物学隐喻。在此标准基础上作者提出了NEAR(意为:接纳新事象并反还原论的)演化经济学才是真正的演化经济学。在批评还原论的局限的基础上,本文引入了突现和新事象的概念,并对新事象与内生性、新事象与数学形式化、新事象与突现的关系作了讨论。凭藉突现的概念,本文力图对自由意志论与决定论的古老两难给出解答。本文还指出,新事象的引入和对还原论的抛弃都必须倚赖突现的概念,突现是社会经济系统演化过程的中心特征。最后对NEAR演化经济学的先驱凡勃伦、康芒斯、霍布森、米契尔和凯恩斯分别作出简要的评论。
This paper first uses three criteria to classify evolutionary economists and evolutionary economists: 1. Ontological criteria: whether to accept new things; 2. Methodological standards: acceptance or rejection of reductionism; 3. Metaphor standards: Is it widely used Biology metaphor. On the basis of this standard, the author proposes NEAR (meaning: to accept new things and anti-reductionist) evolutionary economics is the real evolutionary economics. On the basis of criticizing the limitations of reductionism, this paper introduces the concept of emergent and new things, and discusses the relationship between new things and endogeneity, new things and mathematics, new things and emergencies. With the concept of emergencies, this article seeks to answer the ancient dilemma of free will and determinism. The article also points out that the introduction of new phenomena and the abandonment of reductionism must rely on the notion of emergentness, which is the central feature of the evolution of the socio-economic system. Finally, the author of the NEAR evolutionary economics Veblen, Commen, Hobson, Mitchell and Keynes respectively make a brief comment.