论文部分内容阅读
在这辑的《人大法律评论》上,登出了我的同事黄翔教授对我的著作《旧邦新命:古今中西参照下的古典儒家政治哲学》的批评,以及台湾大学哲学系林明照教授的回应。其中讨论的焦点,是关于如何理解儒家、如何看待形而上学与政治哲学的关系,等等。这与法律有什么关系呢?这里我做个解释,也顺便很简单地回应一下两位教授的批评。几百年来,很多中国学人的一个共识,是要在中国建立起来宪政与法治。但是,这种建设所经历的种种挫折,让很多学人去追究其原因。其中一种说法,
In this series of “People’s Law Review,” my colleague, Professor Huang Xiang, published my criticism of the old state-new life: the classical Confucian political philosophy under the ancient and modern Chinese and Western references, and Lin Mingzhao Professor’s response. The focus of the discussion is on how to understand Confucianism, how to treat the relationship between metaphysics and political philosophy, and so on. What does this have to do with law? Here I will explain, and by the way, I will respond very briefly to the criticisms of the two professors. For centuries, a consensus among many Chinese scholars is to establish constitutionalism and the rule of law in China. However, the setbacks experienced by this kind of construction have led many scholars to investigate their causes. One of them,