论文部分内容阅读
在2016年5月最高人民法院公布的12起撤销监护人资格的典型案例中,发生在福建、江苏、海南、湖北、四川、黑龙江6省的7个案件各具特色,值得研究,从中可看出监护人资格撤销制度的一些不足之处。未成年人的判后安置问题关系到未成年人的健康成长,是该制度的核心问题。相比于机构抚养,家庭抚养具有明显的优势。因此,对于此类案件的处理,应以涉案未成年人的生理、心理状况为依据,选择最适合未成年人的安置方式,尽可能使涉案未成年人能够在家庭环境中生活。为优化未成年人的安置方式,立法上应修改被收养人的条件,人民法院应主动参与判后未成年人的安置过程,民政部门也应制定监护人资格撤销制度的实施细则。
In the typical case of withdrawal of guardianship qualification issued by the Supreme People’s Court in May 2016, the seven cases that occurred in the six provinces of Fujian, Jiangsu, Hainan, Hubei, Sichuan and Heilongjiang are each worthy of study and worth studying. Guardianship system of some of the drawbacks of revocation. The post-trial placement of minors relates to the healthy growth of minors and is the core issue of the system. Compared with the institutional support, family support has obvious advantages. Therefore, the handling of such cases should be based on the physiological and psychological conditions of minors involved in the case, select the most suitable for minors placement, as far as possible so that minors involved in the family environment can live in life. In order to optimize the placement of minors, the conditions of adoptees should be amended in legislation, and the people’s courts should take the initiative to participate in the process of post-sentence minors’ placement. The civil affairs departments should also formulate the implementation rules for the guardianship qualification revocation system.