古人对名节观念的探讨常体现在史论史评之中,因此由史论文章窥察其对名节的态度,可弥补诗歌研究的不足。明清之际遗民士人直接面对名节选择的问题,却往往通过史论表达出对名节观念的消解态度。其消解名节价值的方法主要有三种:一是以成败结果论取代道德原则论;二是在名节价值之外找寻更崇高的价值追求;三是探寻名节价值的根本,从而剥除其不合时宜的外壳。他们对“死节”这一极端行为的态度尤其谨慎,消解力度亦尤甚。 The ancients’ discussion of the concept of famous section is often reflected in the historical evaluation of the history. Therefore, looking at the famous section’s attitude from the history of the essay can make up for the insufficiency of the study of poetry. In the Ming and Qing dynasties, the enlisted scholars directly confronted with the choice of famous section, but often expressed the dispelling attitude toward the famous section concept through the history theory. There are mainly three ways to dispel the value of fame: one is to replace the moral principle with the result of success or failure; the other is to seek a higher lofty value pursuit beyond the fame value; the other is to explore the fundamental value of fame, Outdated shell. They are particularly cautious about the extreme act of “dead-end” and are particularly effective in resolving this extremism.