《时效解释》第22条对罹于时效之债的履行及同意履行作出了规定。然笔者以为,该条规定存在问题。本文试从法条本身出发,对其进行学理分析,并参照罗马法上“自然债务”之规定,指出其问题所在,并寻求合理的解决方式。 Article 22 of the Interpretation of Limitation provides for the performance of the debt of limitation and the performance of its consent. However, I think this article provides for the existence of problems. This article tries to start from the law itself, to carry out academic analysis, and with reference to Roman law “natural debt ”, pointing out the problem, and seek a reasonable solution.