论文部分内容阅读
法院作为多元化纠纷解决的重要一环,除了提供传统的裁判、调解之外,为应对在中国式综治社会治理法治模式下纠纷解决的需求,法院还提供社会纠纷尤其是群体性纠纷的非法律视线内的法律建议或者服务。这种公权力的提前介入,可能导致纠纷解决的同质化和司法的泛化,最终损及司法的权威。因此,本文从中国实践出发,就法院纠纷解决方式提出司法产品这个概念,从结构和纠纷解决模式上对其进行分类,意图准确定位不同的司法产品,避免司法泛化损及司法公信。
Courts as an important part of a wide range of dispute resolution, in addition to providing traditional referees, mediation, in response to the Chinese-style comprehensive management of social governance law resolution mode of dispute resolution, the court also provides social disputes, especially mass disputes non- Legal advice or service in the legal context. Such early intervention of public power may lead to the homogenization of dispute resolution and the generalization of the judiciary, which ultimately undermines the authority of the judiciary. Therefore, starting from the practice of China, this article proposes the concept of judicial products on the way of dispute settlement in courts, classifies them according to the structure and the mode of dispute resolution, attempts to accurately locate different judicial products, and avoids the judicial generalization and the loss of judicial credibility.