新闻背景:8月11日,中共中央政治局召开会议,决定今年10月在北京召开中国共产党第十六届中央委员会第三次全体会议,会议主要内容之一是修改宪法部分内容。今年3月的全国“两会”上,全国工商联再次提出关于私有财产立法的建议案,有代表、委员认为,《宪法》中加入“私有财产神圣不可侵犯”的条文,正是体现了党的十六大报告中提出的“完善保护私人财产的法律制度”精神。但这一说法也引出了一些专家学者的不同意见。6月6日,由全国人大常委会委员长吴邦国主持召开了一个高层专家讨论会,听取经济学家、法学家对修宪的意见。其中,将“私有财产神圣不可侵犯”写进《宪法》的问题再次成为专家们关注的热点。应不应把“私有财产神圣不可侵犯”写进《宪法》?现综合各位专家、学者的意见、建议,通过 News Background: On August 11, the Political Bureau of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China held a meeting and decided to hold the third plenary session of the 16th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China in Beijing in October this year. One of the main contents of the meeting was to amend the constitutional part. In March this year, on the national “two sessions,” the All-China Federation of Industry and Commerce once again put forward the proposal on the legislation on private property. Some representatives and members hold the view that adding “the sacred inviolability of private property” in the “Constitution” This reflects the spirit of “improving the legal system for protecting private property” put forward in the report to the 16th National Congress of the Communist Party of China. However, this argument also leads to different opinions of some experts and scholars. On June 6, Wu Bangguo, chairman of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, chaired a high-level expert seminar to hear the views of economists and jurists on the revision of the constitution. Among them, the issue of “sacrosanct private property” written into the “Constitution” has once again become the focus of attention of experts. Should “the sacred inviolability of private property” be written into the “Constitution”? Based on the opinions, suggestions and passage of experts and scholars