论文部分内容阅读
本文在比较和借鉴的基础上,通过研究和分析英国、美国、日本和欧盟的商标异议制度,指出我国现行商标异议制度存在的问题和缺陷,提出在我国《商标法》第三次修改时应增加完善的有关商标确权中的异议程序的规定,如限制提出商标异议的主体、明确规定商标异议的理由与事实、简化商标异议程序、商标异议程序的设置改革以及恶意异议的治理等问题,使我国商标异议制度能够朝着更加灵活和实用的方向进步。
On the basis of comparison and reference, this paper points out the problems and defects of the existing trademark opposition system in our country by studying and analyzing the trademark opposition system in Britain, the United States, Japan and the EU. It puts forward that in the third revision of the “Trademark Law” in our country, Such as restricting the subject of trademark opposition, defining the reasons and facts of trademark opposition, simplifying the procedure of trademark opposition procedure, setting up and reforming the trademark opposition procedure and the administration of malicious objection, etc., So that our trademark opposition system can move in a more flexible and practical direction.