论文部分内容阅读
侦查活动在整个刑事诉讼的过程中起着至关重要的作用。侦查机关为了保障侦查活动的顺利进行会采取一系列强制措施,稍有不慎便会很容易地侵害犯罪嫌疑人的人权。再加上我们国家对于律师在侦查阶段的介入制度是非常不完善的,一旦被侦查机关确定为犯罪嫌疑人之后,嫌疑人往往会陷入一种孤立无援的境地。所以,对于侦查活动的监督便显得尤为重要。因此,针对16年以来的刑诉法有一次大修,本文将从理论结合实践的角度,比较中外关于侦查监督的制度,深刻分析目前我们刑事诉讼活动中对于侦查监督的进步以及仍然存在的缺陷,并提出自己的见解。
Investigation activities play a crucial role in the entire criminal proceedings. Acting on a series of coercive measures in order to ensure the smooth conduct of investigation activities, the investigating organ may easily infringe the human rights of criminal suspects with slight mistake. Coupled with our country for lawyers in the investigation stage of the intervention system is very imperfect, once identified as the suspect by the investigating authorities, the suspects often fall into a situation of isolation. Therefore, it is particularly important for the supervision of investigation activities. Therefore, in view of the overhaul of the Criminal Procedure Law over the past 16 years, this article will compare the systems of investigation and supervision both at home and abroad with theoretical and practical perspectives, and analyze the current progress and the remaining shortcomings in current criminal activities, And put forward my own opinion.