论文部分内容阅读
以我国科学基金同行评议研究为主题,通过对中国知网中的期刊文献、相关学位论文和专著进行数量及研究主题的统计、分析,认为随着时间的推移,研究论文和著作的数量、微观深度研究和宏观研究都呈逐渐增多趋势,但后两者占研究总量比例较小,说明研究深入程度不够。建议以中国科学基金同行评议的实践和国内外该主题研究成果为基础,依靠核心作者群,加强微观深度研究和宏观研究,并举例说明国外的优秀宏观研究进路。
Based on the research of peer review of science funds in our country, through the statistics and analysis of the number of journal articles, related dissertations and monographs in CNKI, and the topics of research, we think that with the passage of time, the number of papers and writings, microscopic Both in-depth research and macroscopic research show an increasing trend, but the latter two account for a small proportion of the total amount of research, indicating that the degree of in-depth study is not enough. Based on the practice of peer review by CASS and the research results at home and abroad, it is suggested that the core author group should be strengthened to strengthen the micro-level and macroscopic research and give an example to illustrate the outstanding macro research approach abroad.