能否在会通中西和会通古今上有所前进,是评价中国学术思想的唯一标准或主要标准。以此为标准,《汉语法学论纲》进行了有益的尝试。其所提出的三个发展阶段,以规范世界为核心的三个世界理论,中国古典心性论,“天理人情国法”的解释框架,汉语法学的法言法语问题,以及法学历史主义,都可圈可点,具有一定的意义。但其在论述中,对于古典中国法律思想正面论述充分,对其负面影响未及讨论充分;在会通古今方面下了功夫,但在会通中西方面相对不足。 Whether or not China and the West peace conference will go forward in ancient times and in this year is the only standard or major standard for evaluating Chinese academic thought. Using this as a criterion, “Outline of Chinese Law” is a useful attempt. The three stages of its development, the three world theories that regulate the world as a core, the interpretation of the Chinese classical theory of mind, the interpretation framework of the law of God and human nature, the problem of French in Chinese law and the historicism of law Commendable, has a certain meaning. However, in his discussion, he discussed the issue of classical Chinese legal thought positively, and did not discuss the negative influence adequately. He worked hard at the meeting of ancient times and modern times but was relatively deficient in the meeting between China and the West.