论文部分内容阅读
In view of the interconflict of multi|objectives in large decision systems, the problem that ranks all the objectives according to several standards is posed. Quantifing the value of decision for objectives according to the traits of researched systems,with the frequency distribution, we construct quantitative indices and then build up the comparative relation of superior and inferior between any two decisions and introduce the relation function which reflects not only the orientation of order but also the extent of superior and inferior for decisions. With calculating the weight coefficient, we put forward several comparative coefficients and finish off the order of superior and inferior of all the decisions for several conflict objectives. By positivist analyses, the solution shows its precise and concise traits dealing with complex decisions.
In view of the interconflict of multi | objectives in large decision systems, the problem that ranks all the objectives according to several standards is posed. Quantifing the value of decision for objectives according to the traits of researched systems, with the frequency distribution, we construct quantitative indices and then build up the comparative relation of superior and inferior between any two decisions and introduce the relation function which reflects not only the orientation of order but also the extent of superior and inferior for decisions. With calculating the weight coefficient, we put forward several comparative coefficients and finish off the order of superior and inferior of all the decisions for several conflict objectives. By positivist analyzes, the solution shows its precise and concise traits dealing with complex decisions.