论文部分内容阅读
针对设计领域的成果和设计人才的评估,是否可以有一个相对客观和统一的评价体系?这个问题多年以来一直困扰着整个设计界。设计本身到底是理性优先还是感性更重要,抑或是需要二者兼备?这也是整个设计界一直在探讨的难解课题。本文通过三个维度(感性和理性、技术和技能,以及思维和思想维度)建立了一个评价模型,以尝试解释上述问题,供各位设计界以及艺术界和科学界同仁共同探讨,批评指正。
Can there be a relatively objective and unified evaluation system for the evaluation of design achievements and design talents? This problem has been plaguing the entire design community for many years. Whether the design itself is rational or emotional priority is more important, or need both? This is the design industry has been discussed in the difficult problem. This essay establishes an evaluation model through three dimensions (sensibility and rationality, skills and skills, and thinking and thinking dimensions) in an attempt to explain the above issues for discussion and criticism by colleagues in the design community, the arts community and the scientific community.