分论点是一篇议论文的骨架,简洁醒目的分论点能够清晰地体现作者的论证思路和缜密的思维。但是,分论点确立后,如何展开论述是个难点:分析过多则空洞乏味,举例过长则文体不清,例析无序则杂乱无章。那么,怎样才能力透纸背、生动形象又有条不紊地论述好一个分论点呢?我们不妨按照“扣题解说一简要述例一深化总结”这三个环节展开,分别从“是什么或为什么”“如什么”“有何意义或怎么做”的角度对分论点进行阐述,从而做到例论结合、层次清晰、主次分明,构成各环节独立又相互支 Sub-points is the argument of a thesis skeleton, concise and eye-catching sub-arguments can clearly reflect the author’s argument ideas and careful thinking. However, after the establishment of the sub-arguments, how to expand the discussion is a difficult task: too much analysis is empty and boring. For too long, the style is unclear. So, how can we pass the paperback, vivid and methodical discussion of a sub-argument? We may wish to follow the “buckle to explain a brief example of a deepening summary ” these three links, respectively, from “what is or why ”“ If ”“ what is the meaning or how to do ”point of view on the sub-arguments, so as to achieve the combination of the theory, the level is clear, the primary and secondary are distinct, constitute each link independent and mutual support