中国的宪法学研究自20世纪90年代初打破“阶级斗争”教条后,研究的范式逐步向“权利本位理论”转换,在宪法学研究方法上,也逐步为学者所重视,形成了比较有影响的如“法解释学”、“规范宪法学”的方法论。但笔者认为在这些研究范式和方法论的形成过程中仍然存在仅在意识形态上转换,而没有进行研究方法上改进的问题,因此需要进行一些反思和清理。 After China’s constitutional law broke the dogma of “class struggle” in the early 1990s, the paradigm of research gradually shifted to “rights-based theory”, and gradually became the focus of scholars in constitutional law research and formed More influential, such as “law hermeneutics”, “normative constitutional law” methodology. However, the author believes that there still exists only the ideological transformation in the process of the formation of these research paradigms and methodologies, and there is no issue of improving the research methods. Therefore, some reflections and cleanups are needed.