钱穆先生的《中国近三百年学术史》 ,就理论体系的严密性和论证过程的逻辑性而言 ,有略胜梁启超同名专著一筹之处。但钱氏之评史论事亦每有容商榷处。今试指其瑜中小疵数点 ,此亦不为尊者讳之意。1 .从谋篇布局上看 ,钱著之体例编排最容商榷处 ,是他漏列了崔东壁 (述 )。崔述集 Mr. Qian Mu’s “Academic History of China in the Past 300 Centuries” is slightly better than that of Liang Qichao’s monograph in terms of the rigor of the theoretical system and the logic of the demonstration process. However, Qian’s comments on the history of the matter are also available for discussion. This test refers to the small number of points in his yoga, this is not revered taboo meaning. From the point of view of layout, the best way to arrange the money is to omit the Cui Dong wall (described). Cui set