论文部分内容阅读
行政裁量权基准制度一经出现便引起了实务界和法律界的广泛讨论,在这些讨论声中,裁量权基准的制定运动正在如火如荼的进行。经过五年左右的发展,现阶段的情况是裁量权基准文件数量十分巨大。因此,在实施过程中是否存在问题、基准文本的内容是否合理、有没有相关的监督行为,这些问题都要经过时间的检验。本文从行政裁量权基准的实施现状出发,从实证角度分析其存在的问题,进一步提出裁量权基准未来的发展出路。
Once the benchmarking system for administrative discretion has aroused widespread discussion in practice and the legal community, in the context of these discussions, the drafting exercise of the right of discretion is in full swing. After five years of development, the current situation is that the number of benchmark documents for discretion is enormous. Therefore, whether there is any problem in the process of implementation, whether the content of the basic text is reasonable or not, and whether there is any related supervisory behavior, these problems must be tested by time. Based on the current status quo of the implementation of administrative discretion benchmarks, this paper analyzes the existing problems from an empirical point of view and further proposes the future development path of discretionary benchmarks.