论文部分内容阅读
大庆联谊案是我国一个有代表性且有重大影响的证券群体诉讼案件,对其诉讼形式、价值取向及其审理效果,理论与实务界有两种截然不同的观点:一种观点认为,本案的诉讼形式有利于受害人的权利救济,在我国群体案件的处理中具有划时代的意义;另一种观点则认为,法院分拆案件、拖延诉讼等做法,影响了受害人的权利救济,助长了上市公司、中介机构制假造假之风的蔓延。那么,我们究竟应当赞同哪一种观点呢?文章在对大庆联谊虚假陈述案以及我国其他群体案件诉讼形式和审理效果方面存在问题分析的基础上,提出了我国群体诉讼制度改革的价值取向。
Daqing Lianyi case is a representative and influential case of securities group litigation in our country. There are two completely different opinions on the litigation form, value orientation and the effect of trial, theory and practice. One view is that the case of The form of litigation is beneficial to the relief of the victim’s rights and is of epoch-making significance in the handling of the cases of the group in our country. Another view is that litigation in the case of the court dismantling the case and delaying litigation has affected the victim’s right relief and promoted the listing Companies, intermediaries fraud spread of the wind. So what kind of views should we agree with? On the basis of the analysis of the problems in the Daqing friendship false statements and other litigation forms and trial effects of other groups in our country, this paper puts forward the value orientation of the reform of the group litigation system in our country.