论文部分内容阅读
处分行为与负担行为不同,处分行为通常指作用于某种既存权利之上的特定民事行为,包括权利的变更、转让等。在理论体系上,物权与债权相区分的民法体系是处分行为与负担行为得以区分的法理学基础框架所在,法律行为理论也是处分行为与负担行为区分理论的法学基础之一。不同的物权变动模式下无权处分行为有着不同的含义。我国采用的物权变动模式的基本原则是债权形式主义,债权意思主义仅为其例外情形。基于此种物权变动模式下,我国《合同法》、《物权法》以及《担保法》及其司法解释对无权处分行为有着互相冲突的规定,本文试图对这些矛盾进行梳理,并提出自己的合理化建议。
Discipline and burden of behavior is different from the act of disposition usually refers to act on a particular kind of existing rights of specific civil behavior, including the right to change, transfer and so on. In the theoretical system, the civil law system that distinguishes the real right and the creditor’s right is the jurisprudence basic framework that distinguishes the act of punishment from the act of burden. The law of action theory is also one of the legal bases for the theory of the distinction between act of punishment and act of burden. Different kinds of real rights changes under the mode of disposition have different meanings. The basic principle of the mode of property right change adopted in our country is the formalism of creditor’s rights, and the creditor’s sense of doctrine is only the exception. Based on this kind of mode of property right change, China’s “Contract Law”, “Property Law” and “Security Law” and its judicial interpretation of the right to dispose of conflict have conflicting provisions, this paper attempts to sort out these contradictions and put forward their own Rationalized suggestions.