论文部分内容阅读
国土厅的发言承认其所发出两个电报是不慎重,不妥当的,这与其在发电报时相比有了很大的进步。我们对此表示欢迎。但表态仍很不深刻,主要是认识上对法律程序缺乏常识,颠倒了权力机关与行政机关的关系。另外,对现在要改正问题的集中表现是那两个电报怎么办?到底执不执行我们的条例,没有表态。希望国土厅进一步考虑这个问题。我们质询的目的是要促进依法治省,以进一步教育人为目的。提几点意见:首先要回答一个问题,这个条例究竟与国家的房地产管理法有没有抵触?我们省的条例经常委会审议通过后即报全国人大常委会,上报时间至今已4个多月了,如有抵触,应该反馈回来,至今没有,说明没有抵触。况且我们的法规先于全国人大的。根据国家房地产管理法第六条、第六十条、第六十二条规定,我们制订这个条例是完全合法的。且在制订过程中发
It is improper and improper for the Lands Department’s speech to admit that it is not proper and proper to make two telegrams sent by it. This is a great improvement compared with the telegram. We welcome this. However, the position is still not very profound. It is mainly due to the lack of common understanding of legal procedures and the reversal of the relationship between the organs of power and the administrative organs. In addition, what are the two telegrams about the concentrated performance of the problems now to be rectified? In the end, we will not implement our ordinance and will not stand. I hope the Land Agency to further consider this issue. The purpose of our question is to promote the rule of law in the province in order to further educate people for the purpose. A few comments: First of all, to answer a question, the regulations and the country’s real estate management has nothing to do with the conflict? The regulations of our province after the NPC Standing Committee examined and approved that the NPC Standing Committee, the reporting time has been more than 4 months If there is any conflict, it should be fed back, so far no explanation is no conflict. Moreover, our laws precede the NPC. According to Article 6, Article 60 and Article 62 of the State Real Estate Administration Law, it is perfectly legal for us to draw up this Ordinance. And made in the development process