一、引言近年来,在我国刑事诉讼领域造成震动效应的个案,莫过于李化伟杀死妻子的冤案(下文简称李案)和杜培武杀死二名警官的冤案(下文简称杜案)。这两个冤案,令法定的证据定义尴尬,惟有归责于参与逼供信的警官。笔者认为,酷刑逼供者固然有其责任,不从根本上解决问题,还会有张化伟、王培武出现。这是由规则的 I. INTRODUCTION In recent years, there have been a number of cases that have caused the shock effect in the field of criminal procedure in our country. They include the injustice of Li Huawei’s wife killing (hereinafter referred to as Li) and the injustice of Du Peiwu killing two police officers (hereinafter referred to as Du). The two injustices embarrassed the definition of statutory evidence and were only attributable to the police officers who participated in the forced confession. The author believes that torture torture condolences have their own responsibility, not to fundamentally solve the problem, there will be Zhanghua Wei, Wang Peiwu appear. This is by the rules