论文部分内容阅读
历代史籍对梁元帝萧绎“江陵焚书”卷数的记载存在歧异,通过比较分析相关史料,认为“江陵焚书”十四万卷为确切之数。以此伸展分析,《梁书》、《南史》、《隋书》及《志》不载和散见《金楼子》是因为在唐史馆臣在编修贞观诸史时未见《金楼子》一书。《金楼子》复出的时间约在唐中、晚时期(约八至九世纪),两宋时期已入秘府收藏。探讨“江陵焚书”的卷数,还有助于明晰当代历史文献学对这一图书厄难史实的歧异。
Historical records on the history of Liang Yuan Di Xiao Yi “Jiangling burning book ” volume records there are differences, through the analysis of relevant historical data, that “Jiangling burning book ” 140,000 volumes for the exact number. According to this extension analysis, “Liang Shu”, “Nan Shi”, “Sui Shu” and “Zhi” contain neither “Golden House” nor “Golden House” House “a book. ”Golden House“ back about the time in the Tang Dynasty, the late period (about eight to nine century), the Song Dynasty has entered the secret palace collection. Exploring the volume of ”Jiangling burning books" also helps to clarify the differences between contemporary history and literature in this book.