如今谈到基础课教学,人们会觉得象听到谈论天空为什么是蓝色的那样乏味和不以为然。正因为是老生常谈的问题。许多人对基础课教学中存在的问题熟视无睹,以至许多基础教学已形同虚设,风格变成了体系,偏爱被当成了规律,人们常常愿意去谈朗朗上口的艺术哲理,憧憬光辉的未来,却也常常忽略我们周围存在的缺点和危机。熟悉,不等于理解,就象有人问及人体由多少块骨头组成,尽管答案就在我们自己身上,但恐怕正确的回答不会很多,于是又说那是医生和解剖学家的事儿一样。近几年来,中国美术飞速发展,变化巨大,不同的艺术观念及流派层出不穷,而我们建国以来长期形成的教学体制,在迎面扑来的新形势下却有一种失措之感:要么以不变应万变,要么听之任之。显然,两者都违背了院派教学的宗旨。一成不变只能害人,但任其自然发展,也就否定了学院教学存在的意义和价值。这种状态我们不能不严肃对待。就此我谈几点看法。 Nowadays when it comes to basic instructional teaching, people feel as boring and disagreeable as to why they talk about why the sky is blue. It is because of the commonplace problem. Many people turn a blind eye to the problems that exist in the teaching of basic courses, and many basic teaching has become ineffective. The style has become a system. The preference is regarded as a law. People often are willing to talk about the philosophical art philosophy, longing for a glorious future, but often Ignore the shortcomings and crises that surround us. Familiarity does not mean understanding. Just as someone asks how many bones the human body is made of. Even though the answer lies on us, I am afraid that there will not be many correct answers. That is to say, it is the same thing that doctors and anatomists do. In recent years, the rapid development of Chinese art has changed dramatically. Different artistic concepts and genres emerge in an endless stream. However, the long-established teaching system since the founding of the People’s Republic of China has a sense of inattentiveness under the new situation of lunacy: Changeable, or let it go. Obviously, both are against the purpose of academic teaching. Impermanence can only be harmful, but its natural development, it also denied the existence of college teaching significance and value. We can not but take this situation seriously. In this regard I talk a few comments.