论文部分内容阅读
在国际法以及世界各大法系国內法有关证据相关性、证明价值、可采性等事项的评估方法尚未统一,而法官基于“自由心证”对该问题享有近乎绝对裁量权情形下,国际刑事法院法官在遵守规约法律框架的同时,在确认指控裁决中充分运用裁量权对证据可采性问题作出具有倾向性的裁定,即法官对“证据判断方法”关注的焦点与法定要求不同,对证据可采性认定采取宽松态度和“重实质轻形式”的解释方法。
In the international law and the law of the world’s major legal systems related to the evidence, the proof value, admissibility and other matters of the assessment methods have not been unified, and judges based on “free testimony ” on the issue of almost absolute discretion, While observing the statutory legal framework, judges of ICC make full use of the discretion in confirming the allegation decision to make a propensity decision on the admissibility of evidence, that is, the judge’s focus and statutory requirements on the “method of evidence judgment” Different, to accept the admissibility of evidence to adopt a relaxed attitude and “pragmatic light form ” interpretation method.