论文部分内容阅读
2012年新修改的《刑事诉讼法》第79条第二款明确将“曾经故意犯罪”列为逮捕的迳行条件之一,体现了立法者完善我国强制措施的决心与愿望。但曾经故意犯罪中包含有时间和犯罪类型的变量,且这些变量在很大程度上对社会危险性的评判起着标杆的作用,不进一步细化,实践中难以实现个案的公平与正义,本文就此提出自己的初步设想,如何科学规范有待立法和司法的进一步探索与验证。
Paragraph 2 of Article 79 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, newly amended in 2012, clearly stipulates that “intentionally criminality” is one of the conditions for arrest and reflects the determination and desire of legislators to perfect our coercive measures. However, deliberate crimes have included variables of time and types of crimes, and these variables play a benchmark role in judging social hazards to a large extent. It is difficult to further the fairness and justice of individual cases without further elaboration. In this regard, put forward their own initial ideas, how to scientifically standardize the legislation and the judiciary to further explore and verify.