论文部分内容阅读
20世纪初,“神话”甫一进入中国学界即成为中国现代精英用来思考中国现实处境及命运的新概念工具,并在当代中国文明探源工程和可持续发展的文化产业中继续担当思想资源的重任。然而,百年来,人们对神话介入中国现代学术和社会重大问题实践及其不断被遮蔽、边缘化甚至被驱逐等现象背后的新旧观念、话语的较量与纠葛缺乏总体观照与反思。谭佳新著《神话与古史》,基于翔实的文献梳理和深入的思辨,逐一重勘了早期引介者的学术诉求和神话观,以神话一古史话语的呈现方式、研究方法及历史价值为经纬,如一面透镜,不但更新了对中国神话学史和古史研究的认识,也揭示了神话学如何曾经与考古学、人类学、历史学等共同形塑了“中国”“中华民族”的现代性认同和表述模式,又如何从根上形塑了当今“中华文明探源工程”的话语形态,从而说明文明探源中的神话学视角是必需的,但同时也是有限度的。
As early as the beginning of the 20th century, “myth ” entered the Chinese academic community as soon as it entered the Chinese academic field and became the new conceptual tool used by the Chinese modern elites to ponder the present situation and fate of China and continue to act as the source of contemporary Chinese civilization and the sustainable development of cultural industries The important task of thinking resources. However, over the past hundred years, people have not reviewed or reconsidered the contest and entanglement of discourse both with old and new concepts behind the myths involved in the practice of China’s modern academic and social issues and their constantly obscured, marginalized or even deported phenomena. Tan Jiaxin wrote “Myths and Ancient History”. Based on detailed literature review and in-depth speculation, Tan Jiaxin revisits the academic appeal and mythology of early introductory referees one by one. According to the presentations, research methods and historical values of mythology and history, , Such as a lens, not only updated their understanding of the history of Chinese mythology and ancient history, but also revealed how mythology once shaped the “Chinese” and “Chinese” together with archeology, anthropology and history “Modern mode of identity and expression, and how to shape the discourse morphology of ” the source of Chinese civilization "from the root, thus illustrating the perspective of mythology in the source of civilization is necessary, but at the same time there is a limit of.