论文部分内容阅读
前人发现,宾语提前为话题的句子若成立则需要满足的一个重要语义条件:陈述部分表述话题的状态。这是宾语提前型话题句成立的语义大前提。这类话题句成立还要满足诸多微观的语义条件。在默认话题部分为定指名词短语(又可分为近指或者远指)的情况下,创造动词携带“了”或者“过”都不可以出现在陈述部分。在话题为近指的情况下,毁灭动词携带“了”不可以出现在陈述部分,但携带“过”则可以出现在陈述部分。在话题为远指的情况下,毁灭动词可以携带“了”或者“过”出现在陈述部分。既不涉及创造也不涉及毁灭的诸多中性动词在定指话题句中表现不一。它们能否出现在定指话题句中,取决于听话人能否依据动词的意义、体标记的意义和相关的语境推理出话题的某种状态。
Previous studies have found that an important semantic condition needs to be fulfilled if a sentence whose subject is advanced in advance is stated: the state of the statement is partially expressed. This is the precondition of the semantic construction of the topic in advance. The establishment of such topics also meet many micro-semantic conditions. When the default topic part is a set of nouns (which can be divided into near-hand or far-to-the-end), the creation of a verb carrying either “” or “over ” can not appear in the statement section. In the case of a near-to-the-title item, the destructive verb carried “” may not appear in the statement part, but carrying “over” may appear in the statement part. Destructive verbs can either carry “” or “over” in the statement section when the topic is far. Many neutral verbs, which are neither involved in creation nor destruction, show mixed expressions in the fixed quotations. Whether they can appear in the fixed-topic sentences depends on whether the listener can deduce a certain state of the topic according to the meaning of the verbs, the meaning of the body marks and the relevant contexts.