论文部分内容阅读
本文拟从《大学》的论述方式角度给予《大学》成篇年代问题一些新证。通观已有研究成果,发现大家几乎都将孟子和荀子作为《大学》写作年代的重要坐标,结果陷入循环论证,无法有力地证实《大学》与孟荀孰先孰后。本文则从同类先秦典籍逻辑笔法的发展角度,发现《大学》的写作思路已超过孟荀及其同时代人的逻辑笔法,这为《大学》的写作在孟荀之后提供了又一个有力的证据。
This article intends to give some new testimonies to the issue of “university” as a whole from the perspective of “university”. Through the research results, we find that almost all of them take Mencius and Xun Zi as the important coordinates of the writing age of “the university”, and the results fall into the cycle of argument and can not forcefully confirm the priority between “university” and Mencius. In this paper, from the perspective of the development of similar logical books of Pre-Qin classics, it is found that the writing of “university” has surpassed the logic of Meng Xun and its contemporaries, which provides yet another strong evidence for the writing of “university” after Meng Xun .