论文部分内容阅读
将《野草》与后现代主义联系在一起进行思考和研究 ,其目的无非是想揭示一种普遍的历史忽略 ,即 :后现代主义绝非是一个时间概念 ,它作为一种思维态势 ,在每个时代极具挑战性和叛逆性的文艺作品中都有存在的可能。我们只要仔细辨认 ,就能在《野草》中发现在今天被称为后现代主义的反本质、反历史的本文和话语特征。这显示 ,作为一个具有叛逆意识和超前意识的作家 ,鲁迅在 2 0年代就具有一种类似于后现代的文化实感和体验。因而 ,尽管《野草》在表面上与西方后现代主义存在着时空背景的区别 ,但在人生态度和思维方式诸方面 ,又存在着许多隐秘的精神联系。本文力图从对本体存在、历史客观性、连续性的怀疑的角度 ,来探寻《野草》中的后现代主义显征。
The purpose of the study of “weeds” and postmodernism is nothing more than to reveal a general historical neglect that: postmodernism is by no means a concept of time, and as a kind of thinking posture, There are possibilities in literary and artistic works that are extremely challenging and rebellious in this era. As long as we carefully identify it, we can find the textual and discourse features of “anti-essence” and anti-history in today’s “weeds”, which are called today’s postmodernism. This shows that as a writer with a sense of treason and foresight, Lu Xun had a kind of cultural realism and experience similar to post-modernism in the 1920s. Therefore, although there is a difference in time and space between “wild grass” and western postmodernism on the surface, there are many hidden spiritual connections in life attitudes and ways of thinking. This paper seeks to explore the postmodernist manifestations in the weeds from the perspective of the existence, historical objectivity and continuity of the noumenon.