论文部分内容阅读
《萧相国世家自序》肯定萧何在楚、汉相争期间,镇抚后方,动员人力物力支援前线,为汉方奠定了胜利的基础。《世家》本文详载平定天下之后,廷议论功,以萧何为元功,位次第一。凡此,均表现了《史记》不愧为“实录”的本色。但在《赞》中,则先贬之为“于秦时为刀笔吏,录录未有奇节。及汉兴,依日月之末光”。终之以为“与闳夭、散宜生等争烈矣!”将萧何与周初不具显赫事功的闳夭、散宜生相比。这种强烈的反差,不免令许多读者困惑。萧何的功业,其实不只是经营后方的后勤总司令而已;同时也是汉朝体制的主要制定者。用现代的话来说,就是汉朝建国的总设计师。司马迁虽然肯定前者,但却难掩对于后者的不满。两种论述并陈,反映了客观的历史事实与历史家的主观好恶之间的差异,留给后人广阔的探索和玩味的空间。
“Xiao Xiangguo’s family preface,” Xiao Xiao certainly determined to be in the Chu, Han during the dispute, town rear, mobilization of manpower and material resources to support the frontline, laid the foundation for the Chinese side victory. “Family” This article details set to calm the world, the Court deliberations on meritorious deeds, with Xiao Ho as Yuan Gong, ranked first. All this shows the “Historical Records” worthy of “Record ” character. However, in the “like”, the first derogatory “” as a knife in the Qin Dynasty, the recording is not surprising .And Hanxing, according to the end of the sun and the moon light . Eventually thought “and 闳 夭, casual students should be fierce labyrinth! ” Will Xiao Ho and Zhou early not prominent job 闳 Yao, compared to casual students. This strong contrast inevitably puzzles many readers. Xiao Ho’s merit career, in fact, is not just running the back of the logistics commander-in-chief only; also the main makers of the Han Dynasty system. In modern terms, it is the chief architect of the founding of the Han Dynasty. Although Sima Qian certainly the former, but conceal the dissatisfaction with the latter. Both arguments and statements reflect the difference between the objective historical facts and the subjective likes and dislikes of the historians and give the descendants a vast space for exploration and playfulness.