乡村旅游作为农村空间商品化的表现形式之一,在增加农民收入、阻止农村衰退、振兴农村经济方面发挥着重要作用。为此本文以北京市昌平区麻峪房村的乡村旅游为例,借助行动者网络理论分析农村空间商品化的形成与演变,并讨论农户在此过程中的参与。麻峪房村在从农民生活空间转变为城市居民消费空间的过程中,形成了以区旅游局、乡旅游公司为关键行动者,并吸纳了多个人类和非人类行动者所构成的行动者网络。在网络形成的过程中农户参与乡村旅游的程度逐渐提高,由此推动了麻峪房村农村空间商品化的发展。麻峪房村演变为城市居民消费空间后,由于行动者网络发生变化使农村空间商品化发生变化,导致麻峪房村农村空间商品化程度降低。同时新的行动者网络中的各行动者的不对等性明显,各行动者之间存在很多异议,使该网络趋于僵化、丧失活力,不足以支撑麻峪房村乡村旅游继续发展。在麻峪房村农村空间商品化的形成过程中,农户的院落区位、年龄与原有工作等对农户参与乡村旅游的意愿产生不同的影响。当农村地区行动者网络中的关键行动者与行动者利益共通且紧密联系时,其空间商品化就得到强化,反之亦然。 As one of the forms of commercialization of rural space, rural tourism plays an important role in increasing farmers’ income, preventing the rural recession and rejuvenating the rural economy. In this paper, we take rural tourism in Mayufang Village, Changping District, Beijing as an example to analyze the formation and evolution of rural space commercialization with the aid of the network theory of actors and discuss the participation of rural households in this process. During the transition from peasants ’living space to urban residents’ consumption space, Mayufang Village formed the key actors of the District Tourism Bureau and township tourism companies and absorbed many actors composed of human and non-human actors The internet. In the process of network formation, rural households gradually increased their participation in rural tourism, thus promoting the commercialization of rural space in Mayufang Village. After Mayufang village evolved into urban residents’ consumption space, the commercialization of rural space changed due to the change of actors network, resulting in the reduction of commercialization of Mayufang village rural space. At the same time, the unequal equivalence of various actors in the new network of actors and the many objections among various actors have made the network rigid and unproductive, which is not enough to support the continued development of rural tourism in Mayu Village. During the formation of commercialization of rural space in Mayufang Village, the location, age and original work of rural households have different impacts on their willingness to participate in rural tourism. When the key actors and actors in rural actors’ networks are common and intimately connected, their spatial commodification is strengthened and vice versa.