发展风险抗辩制度及其启示

来源 :法律适用 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:n131421d
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
科技的日新月异给产品责任法带来一个非常复杂的问题:在以严格责任为基础的产品责任法领域,生产者应否对因科技发展而凸显出来的产品风险承担责任?这个问题无论在作为现代产品责任法鼻祖的美国和还是在采取各种方式推进产品责任统一立法进程的欧洲,一直没有停止争论。研究美欧发展风险抗辩制度对我国相应制度的发展和完善具有一定的借鉴意义和启示作 The ever-changing technology brings a very complex question to the product liability law: Should producers be held responsible for product risks that emerge as a result of technological developments in the area of ​​product liability law based on strict liability? Whether in the modern Whether the United States, the originator of the product liability law, or whether it has adopted various ways to promote the uniform legislative process of product liability, has not stopped the debate. Studying the Defensive System of Development Risk in the United States and Europe Has Some Significance and Enlightenment to the Development and Perfection of the Corresponding System in Our Country
其他文献
以面包与猎物为主食的上古世纪法国菜的历史源远流长。在公元初,古代高卢人(法国人)以农为业,农人们以自己种植的大麦、燕麦、玉米、小麦等作物制成各种干粮、面包,从此以后,