论文部分内容阅读
科研腐败问题正引起越来越多的关注。文章在一个委托代理分析框架下,使用2001-2011年省级面板数据,从经验层面考察了科研反腐力度对创新产出效率的影响。研究发现:(1)事后惩戒力度(即科研反腐力度)对科研产出效率(即创新产出效率)的影响是非线性的,二者之间呈现倒U形关系。在早期发展阶段,随着收入水平的提升,事后惩戒力度的下降有利于提升科研产出效率;随着经济发展水平的进一步提升,事后惩戒力度的增加有利于提升科研产出效率。(2)事后惩戒力度对科研产出效率还有间接的影响,降低事后惩戒力度有利于提高科研经费配置对科研产出效率的贡献。本研究为理解科研经费资金的使用效率提供了有益的视角和初步的经验证据。
The problem of corruption in scientific research is attracting more and more attention. Under the framework of principal-agent analysis, the paper uses provincial panel data from 2001 to 2011 to examine the impact of scientific research anti-corruption on innovation output efficiency from an empirical perspective. The findings are as follows: (1) The effect of post-disciplinary efforts (ie, scientific research and anti-corruption efforts) on the research output efficiency (ie, innovation output efficiency) is nonlinear and inverted U-shaped. In the early stage of development, with the improvement of income level, the decrease of disciplinary efforts will help to improve the output efficiency of scientific research. With the further improvement of economic development, the increase of post-disciplinary efforts will help improve the output efficiency of scientific research. (2) Post-disciplinary efforts have an indirect effect on the output of scientific research, and reducing the amount of after-court disciplinary efforts is conducive to raising the contribution of scientific research funding to the output of scientific research. This study provides a useful perspective and preliminary empirical evidence to understand the efficiency of the use of funds for research funding.