论文部分内容阅读
目的了解新疆地区汉族、维吾尔族、哈萨克族公安民警心理健康、人格和应对方式现状,为有针对性地进行心理干预提供参考依据。方法采用随机抽样方法,抽取新疆地区15个地州的4 255名汉族、维吾尔族、哈萨克族公安民警进行艾森克人格问卷(EPQ)、应对方式问卷(CSQ)和症状自评量表(SCL-90)调查及对比分析。结果新疆地区公安民警躯体化、强迫、人际关系敏感、抑郁、焦虑、敌对、恐怖、偏执、精神病性得分分别为(1.70±0.76)、(1.86±0.73)、(1.69±0.72)、(1.65±0.74)、(1.62±0.71)、(1.67±0.76)、(1.38±0.61)、(1.62±0.71)、(1.52±0.63)分,均高于全国常模(P<0.05),不同民族公安民警躯体化、人际关系敏感、抑郁、焦虑、恐怖、精神病性6个因子差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);人格特质方面,新疆地区男性公安民警精神质、神经质得分分别为(5.21±3.22)、(10.77±6.07)分,均低于全国常模(P<0.05);内外向,掩饰性得分分别为(12.12±4.44)、(12.43±3.94)分,均高于全国常模(P<0.05);女性公安民警精神质、神经质、掩饰性得分分别为(5.04±3.03)、(10.48±5.87)、(12.56±3.80)分,均低于全国常模(P<0.05),内外向为(12.15±4.29)分,高于全国常模(P<0.05);不同民族公安民警人格特征差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);在应对方式上,维吾尔族公安民警幻想和退避因子得分高于汉族公安民警,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论新疆地区公安民警的心理健康水平低于全国常模,不同民族公安民警心理健康水平和应对方式有差异。
Objective To understand the current situation of mental health, personality and coping styles of Han, Uighur and Kazak police in Xinjiang and to provide a reference for targeted psychological intervention. Methods A total of 4 255 Han, Uygur and Kazak police officers in 15 prefectures and prefectures in Xinjiang were selected to conduct a questionnaire survey using EPQ, CSQ and SCL -90) survey and comparative analysis. Results The scores of somatization, compulsion, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, terror, paranoid and psychosis in Xinjiang police were (1.70 ± 0.76), (1.86 ± 0.73), (1.69 ± 0.72) and 0.74), (1.62 ± 0.71), (1.67 ± 0.76), (1.38 ± 0.61), (1.62 ± 0.71) and (1.52 ± 0.63) points respectively, all higher than the national norm (P <0.05) There were significant differences among the six factors in somatization, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, terror and psychosis (P <0.05). In terms of personality traits, the mental and neurotic scores of male policemen in Xinjiang were (5.21 ± 3.22 ) And (10.77 ± 6.07) points lower than the national norm (P <0.05). The scores of internal and external masking were (12.12 ± 4.44) and (12.43 ± 3.94) points, respectively, <0.05). The mental, neurotic and disguise scores of female police officers were (5.04 ± 3.03), (10.48 ± 5.87) and (12.56 ± 3.80) points, respectively, which were lower than those of national norms (P <0.05) (12.15 ± 4.29) points higher than that of the national norm (P <0.05). There was no significant difference in personality traits among different nationalities policemen (P> 0.05). On the way of coping, Uighur people Police fantasy and retreat scores higher than the Han police, the difference was significant (P <0.05). Conclusion The mental health level of public security police in Xinjiang is lower than that of the national average. The mental health status and coping styles of different ethnic police are different.