论文部分内容阅读
在我国司法实践中,对“搭便车”形式的不正当竞争行为或依据《反不正当竞争法》的具体条款进行认定,或依据一般条款加以认定,二者均体现了《反不正当竞争法》对经营者合法竞争利益、消费者合法权益以及正当竞争秩序保护的立法取向。按照《反不正当竞争法》第2条认定“搭便车”不正当竞争行为时,需要理解三个方面:首先,该行为属于一种市场竞争行为;其次,该行为违反了市场竞争基本原则;最后,该行为对市场竞争造成了损害。具体到个案认定,是否构成不正当竞争,主要从五个方面进行分析:竞争关系之认定、原告产品或服务的知名度、违法行为、主观过错及损害后果,在网络不正当竞争案件的审理中,法院对竞争关系认定、违法性界定、损害后果认定,发展出新型的规制“搭便车”的认定规则。
In our country’s judicial practice, the unfair competition in the form of “free-riding” or the specific provisions of the “Anti-Unfair Competition Law” is affirmed, or according to the general terms to be identified, both of which reflect the “anti-unjust Competition Law ”to the legal competition of business interests, the legitimate rights and interests of consumers and the legitimate competition in the protection of legislative orientation. According to Article 2 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law, “free-riding” unfair competition behavior, we need to understand three aspects: First of all, the behavior is a kind of market competition behavior; Second, the behavior is in violation of the basic market competition Finally, the act caused damage to market competition. Specific cases to determine whether it constitutes unfair competition, mainly from five aspects: the determination of competition, the plaintiff’s products or services visibility, illegal behavior, subjective fault and damage the consequences of the network unfair competition in the trial, The court determined the competition relationship, defined the illegality, identified the consequences of damage, and developed a new regulation of “free riding”.