论文部分内容阅读
1、今成皋,陕西大涧中,立土动及百尺,迥然耸立,亦雁荡具体而微者。(《梦溪笔谈·雁荡山》) 2、大阉之乱,缙绅而能不易其志者,四海之大,有几人欤?(《五人墓碑记》这是高中《语文》第四册“单元知识和训练”中所列举的两个定语后置说的例句,课本将“具体而微”、“能不易其志”分别看作是修饰“雁荡”和“缙绅”的后置定语.同时,对第一例,在第二册课文注释中还作有更为具体的分析说明: [亦雁荡具体而微者]相当于“亦具体而微之雁荡”,也(可算是)具体而微的雁荡山.具体而微,形体齐备而规模较小。笔者认为以上分析大可商榷.把这两例说成是定语后置结构,其实是不应有的疏误。先看第一例.这里关键是要对“具体而微”作出正确理解.新版《辞源》将它解释为“内容大体
1, now Chenggao, Shaanxi Dajian, Tudou move and hundred feet, very wide stand, but also the wild goose specific. (“Meng Xi Bi Tan Yandang Mountain”) 2, the castration of chaos, gentry and hard-edged person, universal big, how many people? (“Five tombstone” This is the high school “language” The example sentences of the two attributives listed in “Unit Knowledge and Training” show that the texts are “specific and minor” and “can not be easily identified” respectively as the post-affirmation of “Yudang” and “gentry.” At the same time, The first case, in the second volume of text notes also made more specific analysis shows that: [also Yandang specific who] is equivalent to “Yandang is also specific and micro”, but also (can be) specific and Yandang Shan. Complete and small-scale .I think the above analysis is questionable .To these two cases is said attributive postpositional structure, is actually an undoubted error .First look at the first case .Here the key is to be “specific and micro” made Correct understanding of the new version of “Ci Yuan” interpreted it as "content general