论文部分内容阅读
通过比较分析李锐、王鸣盛和江声等人对《尚书·召诰》日名问题的研究,阐明清代乾嘉学者以古历推算史事年代的实践、方法特点和意义。他们根据《召诰》《洛诰》等文本中的月相及相应日名,利用性质类似的古六历和《四分历》对周初历日进行推算,支持东汉经学家郑玄的结论。其中,王鸣盛和江声的推算比较简略;李锐则撰写专论,详考郑玄在其他经注中的历法计算,并依照经其校补的《四分历》术文,推算出周初史事年谱和部分月日谱。这种以古历推算为基础的年代学研究方法,对罗士琳、李善兰、汪曰桢等后来的学者有着重要的影响。
Through the comparative analysis of Li Rui, Wang Mingsheng and Jiang Sheng et al., The study on the issue of the title of Shang Shu Zha Pei, the author clarifies the practice, method and significance of the historical chronology by cadres and scholars in Qing Dynasty. According to the phases of the moon and the corresponding Japanese names in the texts such as “summon” and “loafer”, they used the similar ancient calendar of six and the “fourth calendars” to calculate the calendar days of the first week and supported the conclusion of the Eastern Han scholar Zheng Xuan. Among them, the calculation of Wang Mingsheng and Jiang Sheng is relatively simple; Li Rui wrote a monograph on Zheng Xuan’s calendars in other calendars and calculated according to the “Quarter Calendar” Chronology and part of the monthly spectrum. This method of chronological study based on the calculation of the ancient calendar has an important influence on later scholars such as Luo Shilin, Li Shanlan and Wang Yuezhen.