论文部分内容阅读
自康熙六年(1667年)安徽建省至乾隆二十五年(1760年),安徽布政使司一直寄治邻省江宁,引发了一些误解,其中最有影响的是以之为据否认这一时期安庆正式作为安徽省会的论说。对此进行辨正,可以还原历史的本真:在清代行政体制中,总督和巡抚是省级最高行政首脑,掌控地方最高权力。巡抚专辖一省,“略如古之行台省及元之行中书省”。承宣布政使司已失去了明初设置时代表一省的权威地位而成为督抚手下的办事机构。判定一省省会应以督抚驻地特别是每省皆设的巡抚驻地为标准,不能简单地以布政使司驻地为依据。在安徽布政使司寄治江宁的近百年里,安庆作为安徽巡抚驻地,理所当然为安徽省省会。
Since the six years of Kangxi (1667), Anhui Province and Qianlong (2560) (1760), Anhui’s Chief of Political Clinics has been handling neighboring Jiangning for some time, causing some misunderstandings. The most influential one is that it is denied Anqing this period officially as the Anhui provincial government’s argument. Discrimination of this can restore the true nature of history: In the administrative system of Qing Dynasty, the Governor and the governor were the highest provincial executive heads and took control of the supremacy of local authority. Governor under the jurisdiction of a province, “a little more ancient Taiwan and Taiwan visit yuan”. Cheng announced that the Chief Secretary had lost the authority of a province when the Ming Dynasty was set up to become the office of the governor. Judging that the provincial capital of a province should be based on the standards of the governors ’residences, especially the governors’ residences set up in every province, can not simply be based on the presence of the Chief Minister of Administration and Disarmament. In the nearly a century when Anhui’s Chief Political Officer placed Jiangning, Anhui Province, as the governor of Anhui Province, resigned as the provincial capital of Anhui Province.