论文部分内容阅读
上世纪 90年代以来 ,我国的马克思主义哲学的研究出现了许多新的特点 ,其中论文、专著的数量之大是引人注目的 ,而学术观点的丰富、多变也同样是引人注目的。可以说 ,这是一个探索的时期 ,也是一个变化的时期。所谓“变化” ,其涵义是 :有关马克思主义哲学的“学术化”的诉求 ,改变了既往马克思主义哲学的面貌 ,增强了研究者的个体化倾向 ,导致了问题和研究范式的转变。如果说 ,既往马克思主义哲学的研究往往是“经典→问题”的模式 ,那么 ,90年代以来的马克思主义哲学研究则更多地采取“问题→现代西方哲学 (及“西方马克思主义”)的中介性工具→经典”的方法。这种变化给马克思主义哲学的论域、问题及论证方式带来了深刻的影响 ,以致某些论著中的“马克思主义哲学”的边界不像它应该有的那样清晰。这既有着逻辑的和现实的深刻根源 ,也是探索中常见的一种现象。对这种转变的功过作出客观的评价似乎还为时尚早 ,但及时地反思研究中的一些问题却是必要而意义深远的。这种反思能使我们更加清晰、深刻地认识马克思主义哲学的立场 ,同时也是我们推进马克思主义哲学研究的一种方式。有鉴于此 ,《中国社会科学》杂志社、《哲学研究》杂志社分别与中山大学马克思主义哲学与中国现代化研究所召开“唯物史观的理?
Since the 90s of last century, there have been many new characteristics in the study of Marxist philosophy in our country. The number of dissertations and monographs is remarkable. The abundance and change of academic views are also striking. It can be said that this is a period of exploration, but also a period of change. The so-called “change” means that the “academic” appeal of Marxist philosophy has changed the face of past Marxist philosophy, enhanced the tendency of individualization of researchers, and led to the transformation of problems and research paradigms. If we say that the study of previous Marxist philosophy is often the “classic → problem” model, then the study of Marxist philosophy since the 1990s has more to take the “problem → modern Western philosophy (and” Western Marxism “) intermediary Sex Tools → Classic ”approach. Such changes have profoundly influenced the discourse, problems and modes of argumentation of Marxist philosophy, so that the boundaries of “Marxist philosophy” in some books are not as clear as they should be. This is both a profound source of logic and reality, and is also a common phenomenon in exploration. It seems too early to make an objective appraisal of the merits of such a change, but it is necessary and far-reaching to reflect on some issues in time in a timely manner. Such reflection will enable us to understand the position of Marxist philosophy more clearly and profoundly, and at the same time it will be a way for us to promote the study of Marxist philosophy. In view of this, “China Social Sciences” magazine, “Philosophy Research” magazine and Sun Yat-sen Marxism Philosophy and China Institute of Modernization held a "historical materialism?