论文部分内容阅读
奥尔森根据其搭便车理论而质疑马克思的无产阶级革命理论,当代的理性选择马克思主义对此作出了回应,总体上维护了马克思的理论逻辑。对这一思想公案的分析表明,理性选择马克思主义为马克思主义带来了机制分析等新内容,为马克思主义与西方主流社会科学的对话建立了渠道并丰富了马克思主义的历史唯物主义和阶级分析。但要看到,由于许多理性选择马克思主义者的立场与方法论的原因,他们的不足也显而易见:仅专注于形式分析而忽略了实质分析;看不到无产阶级政党的作用;对辩证法有意无意地否定或误解;基本上失去了实践的冲动,而满足于做一位共产主义运动的旁观者。
Olson questioned Marx’s proletarian revolutionary theory according to his free-riding theory. The contemporary rational choice Marxism responded to this and generally protected Marx’s theoretical logic. An analysis of this ideological act shows that rational choice of Marxism has brought new elements such as institutional analysis to Marxism, established a channel for dialogue between Marxism and the mainstream Western social science and enriched Marxist historical materialism and class analysis . However, we can see that due to many rational choices of Marxist positions and methodological reasons, their inadequacies are also obvious: they focus only on formal analysis but neglect substantive analysis; they can not see the role of proletarian political parties; they consciously or unconsciously Negative or misunderstood; basically losing the impulse to practice and content with being a bystander of a communist movement.