论文部分内容阅读
英国《星期日泰晤士报》的报道说,霍金之所以一直被排除在诺贝尔物理学奖获奖者之外,是因为他的研究被认为是纯理论研究,而且仍然未得到证实。该报援引诺贝尔物理学奖评定委员会秘书安德斯·巴拉尼的话说:“经常有人问我,为什么霍金没有获奖。他的研究成果是相当出色的,但是我们尚不能肯定这个成果是否适用于自然界。”虽然诺贝尔奖评定委员会对理论研究或实验研究的相对优点没有一定之规,但是似乎有一条不成文的规定,即理论科学家只有在自己的研究成果得到实验证实以后才能获得诺贝尔奖。巴拉尼说:“斯蒂芬·霍金是一个很好的例子。”由于人们批评诺贝尔奖的评定办法不再能反映现代科学的发展,诺贝尔奖评定委员会正在考虑对一年一度的诺贝尔奖评定办法实行重大改革。英国《星期日电讯报》的一篇报道
The British “Sunday Times” report said that Hawking has been excluded from the Nobel Prize in Physics because of his research is considered purely theoretical, and still not been confirmed. The newspaper quoted Anders Ballaney, secretary of the Nobel Prize Committee for Physical Sciences, as saying: “Often I was asked why Hawking did not win the prize, and his research was quite good, but we are not yet sure if the result is Applicable to nature. ”“ Although there is no rule on the relative merits of theoretical research or experimental research, the Nobel Committee seems to have an unwritten rule that theoretical scientists can only obtain Nobel if their research results have been experimentally confirmed prize. Barani said: ”Stephen Hawking is a good example.“ ”As people criticize the assessment of the Nobel Prize no longer reflects the development of modern science, the Nobel Prize Committee is considering the annual promise Bell Award evaluation method to implement major reforms. A report by the British “Sunday Telegraph”