论文部分内容阅读
由于历史原因,我国《价格法》列举的不正当价格行为包含一些价格垄断行为。因《价格法》与《反垄断法》的执法机构、权限、认定标准等不同,两法交叉部分需要合理地规划,否则价格立法上的重复将导致价格执法上的两难。结合我国经济转型的市场现状和立法模式,宜选择补充关系来设计《价格法》中交叉部分的相关法律条文。
Due to historical reasons, the unjust price behavior listed in the “Price Law” of our country includes some price monopolistic behavior. Due to the difference between the law of enforcement of the “price law” and the “anti-monopoly law”, the authority and the standard of recognition, the cross-section of the two laws needs to be planned reasonably. Otherwise, the duplication of price legislation will lead to the dilemma of price enforcement. Combined with the current market conditions and legislative model of China’s economic restructuring, we should choose complementary relations to design the relevant provisions of the cross-section of the Price Law.