论文部分内容阅读
周曰校本和夏振宇本《三国志演义》是《三国志演义》版本演变中相对更为历史化的两种刻本。在小说文本的基础上,刊刻者参考理学家的历史论著,依照史学体例,对小说进行了大量的评注。这两种刻本的校订刊行虽未明确标出“评点”、“批评”字样,但在某种程度上已具备了评点本的功能。通过分析两种刻本的评注文字,阐释其受理学家历史观影响下对《三国志演义》小说的历史化评论,揭示其在小说评点学上的价值和意义。
Zhou Yue School and Xia Zhenyu Ben The Romance of the Three Kingdoms is a relatively more historical version of the evolution of the Romance of the Three Kingdoms. Based on the novel’s texts, the journalists make a great deal of commentary on the novel in the light of historiography by referring to the historians’ writings of the Neo-Confucianism. Although the two edition editions of the editorials have not clearly marked the words “criticism” and “criticism”, they have, to some extent, the function of commentary. By analyzing the commentary texts of the two kinds of inscriptions, this essay expounds the historical comments on the novel of Romance of the Three Kingdoms under the influence of the historians of their adversaries, and reveals its value and significance in the criticism of novels.