在分析开放科学数据仓储建设现状的基础上,分别选取国内外不同领域的开放科学数据仓储SRDA、eCrystals和Dryad,比较并总结这些仓储在注册与引用、共享与重用和保存等方面的异同。结果表明,自然科学和社会科学开放数据仓储建设模式存在差异,但具有普适的数据开发方式。 Based on the analysis of the present situation of the construction of open scientific data warehousing, we select the open scientific data warehouses SRDA, eCrystals and Dryad in different fields both at home and abroad to compare and summarize the similarities and differences in registration, reference, sharing and reuse and storage of these warehouses. The results show that there are differences in the construction mode of open data warehousing between natural sciences and social sciences, but with universal data development methods.