论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较双腔气囊导尿管与硅胶管胸腔引流管两种胸腔闭式引流术治疗新生儿气胸的临床应用价值。方法:回顾分析该院行用双腔气囊导尿管(27例)及传统硅胶管(23例)行胸腔闭式引流术治疗新生儿气胸患者的临床资料,并对治疗效果、呼吸机使用时间及手术并发症等状况进行比较。结果:两组患者疗效及死亡率无统计学差异(P>0.05);手术操作时间、呼吸机使用时间及术后并发症相比有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论:双腔气囊导尿管胸腔闭式引流术治疗新生儿气胸具有疗效可靠、手术操作简单、创伤小、并发症少等优点。
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical value of two kinds of thoracic closed drainage in the treatment of neonatal pneumothorax by comparing the dual-chamber balloon catheter and silicone tube chest drainage tube. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the hospital with double balloon catheter (27 cases) and conventional silicone tube (23 cases) underwent thoracic closed drainage in the treatment of neonatal pneumothorax in patients with clinical data, and the treatment effect, ventilator use time And complications such as surgical conditions were compared. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in curative effect and mortality (P> 0.05). There was significant difference in operative time, ventilator time and postoperative complications (P <0.05). Conclusions: Double-chamber balloon catheter thoracic closure drainage for the treatment of neonatal pneumothorax has the advantages of reliable curative effect, simple operation, less trauma and less complications.