论文部分内容阅读
董律师:我是法律服务所的工作人员,前不久在解答咨询中遇到一个法律问题,如何解答掌握不准,特写信向您请教。案情是这样:某村有10户人家,1986年因失火将老房子烧掉了(土地证也被烧)。次年有两户人家申请在老宅基上建房,村上的领导人未同意而让他们在自家菜园上建房子。1993年又有两户被烧农民申请在老宅基地上建房,此次新上任的村支书同意了,作了规划,利用集体所有的宅基地建了房并已搬迁去居住。未被批准的那两户村民提出质询:原土改时的土地证是否有效?
Lawyer Dong: I am a staff member of the legal services. Before I came across a legal problem in the consultation and consultation, how to solve the problem was not allowed. A close-up letter asked for advice. The case is this: a village has 10 households, burned the old house in 1986 due to misfire (the land certificate is also burned). The following year, two families applied for housing on the old house, and Murakami leaders did not agree to let them build a house in their own garden. In 1993, two more burned peasants applied to build houses on the old house site. The newly appointed village party secretary agreed and planned to use the collectively-owned house sites to build houses and move to live. The two villagers who were not approved raised the question: Is the land certificate of the original land reform effective?