论文部分内容阅读
按照人民法院组织法的规定,各级人民法院设立审判委员会。审判委员会的任务有三:一是总结审判经验,二是讨论重大的或者疑难的案件,三是讨论其他有关审判工作的问题。可是,在长期的审判实践中,“审批案件”已成为人民法院审判委员会的“主要任务”。针对这一现状和审判委员会在“审批案件”过程中存在的诸多问题,作者认为,为了有效地实现“公正与效率”的世纪主题,人民法院审判委员会“审批案件”制度应予取消,相应地应强化合议庭和独任审判员的职权,并建议尽快修改法院组织法,重新明确审判委员会的职责和议事规则,对审判委员会的人员组成及回避制度的执行、讨论案件的范围、条件和规则、启动审判委员会讨论案件的程序、经审判委员会讨论案件的裁判文书的署名等,提出了自己的见解。
In accordance with the provisions of the Organic Law of the People’s Court, people’s courts at all levels have established judicial committees. Trial committee has three tasks: First, summarize the experience of trial, the second is to discuss major or difficult cases, the third is to discuss other issues related to the trial work. However, in the long trial practice, the “examination and approval of cases” has become the “main task ” of the people’s court trial committee. In response to the current situation and many problems existing in the process of “approval of cases” by the judicial committee, the author believes that in order to effectively achieve the theme of “fairness and efficiency” in the 21st century, the people’s court trial committee Should be canceled, and correspondingly should strengthen the powers of the collegial panel and the sole judge, and suggested that the constitution of the court be amended as soon as possible to redefine the functions and rules of procedure of the judicial committee, to make the composition of the judicial committee and the avoidance system, and to discuss the case Scope, conditions and rules, the procedures for initiating the trial committee’s discussion of the case and the signature of the adjudication instrument for discussing the case through the judicial committee.