论文部分内容阅读
实践中,一定程度上被作为检察机关和法院“合意”回避无罪判决的手段而使用的撤诉制度的正当性面临着质疑。撤诉制度的存在与诉讼模式、公诉制度、诉审分离等制度关系不大,撤回公诉制度只是在案件已经不具备继续审理必要的情况下终止诉讼、节省司法资源的一种手段,这也是撤回公诉制度存在的根本依据。由于我国撤诉制度缺乏合理限定,以及长期以来人们对错案的不正确理解,造成撤诉制度在实践中被误解和滥用,因此必须从效力、范围、审查、再起诉的条件等方面对撤诉制度加以完善。
In practice, to some extent, the legitimacy of the withdrawal system, which is used as a means by which procuratorate organs and courts “agree ” to avoid acquittal, is challenged. The withdrawal system has little to do with the system of litigation, public prosecution and trial and prosecution. The withdrawal of the prosecution system is only a means of terminating litigation and saving judicial resources if the case is no longer necessary The fundamental basis for the existence of the system. Due to the lack of a reasonable restriction on the withdrawal system and the long-term misunderstanding of the wrong case, the withdrawal system is misunderstood and abused in practice. Therefore, the withdrawal system must be improved from the aspects of validity, scope, conditions of review and prosecution .