论文部分内容阅读
通过司马迁《史记》叙事范式探讨,意在为困扰西方人类学家的一系列问题提供重要启迪,具体包括:以文本而非客观事实为对象的“辨章学术、考镜源流”认识论方式、“述而不作”通过裁剪与实录呈现文化原生态、以“行事深切著明”为特点的超概念深度描述,以及“厥协六经异传,整齐百家杂语”多声部情节植入。这一本土叙述范式是反观西方民族志表述的一面镜子,也是人类学研究为保持中国文化原生态不被错误表征和歪曲解释的重要前提。在经过一系列对西方话语的批判和人类学本土化的讨论后,本文意在开始构建基于几千年传统的中国本土人类学叙事范式。
Through Sima Qian’s narrative paradigm of “Historical Records”, this article intends to provide important enlightenment for a series of questions that plague the Western anthropologists, including: “The chapter is academic, the source of the test” the epistemological way , “” But not “through the cut and the record presents the cultural ecology, to” act deeply and clearly “is characterized by the concept of super-depth description, and” Multi-voice plot implantation. This local narrative paradigm is a reflection of the mirror of Western ethnography and an important prerequisite for anthropological research to maintain the original state of Chinese culture uncharacteristically misrepresented and distorted. After a series of discussions on the criticisms of western discourse and the localization of anthropology, this article is intended to begin to construct a paradigm of Chinese indigenous anthropology based on the tradition of thousands of years.