关锋的大名,我读大学时就知道了。当时,关锋和林聿明、吴传启以“撒人兴”(即三人行)的笔名在《新建设》和《哲学研究》等刊物上发表了不少有关哲学史的文章。口气大而霸气足,其中批判冯友兰的文章“量多而质高”。后来一个北京大学哲学系的毕业生告诉我,冯友兰在给他们讲课时承认,尽管他不完全同意关锋的观点,但认为在所有批判他的文章中,关锋的水平是最高的。1966年3月至6月我被借调到《红旗》杂志工作时,关锋是该杂志的哲学史组组长。一次我们几个人一起去食堂吃中饭,一个《红旗》杂志的工作人员,指着一个瘦小且有点驼背的中年人 Guan Feng’s name, I learned when I was in college. At that time, Guan Feng and Lin Yuming and Wu Chuanqi published many articles on the history of philosophy in the publications such as “New Construction” and “Philosophical Studies” under the pseudonyms of “Caesar” (ie, “Threesomes”). Large and domineering tone, which criticized Feng Youlan article “quantity and quality ”. Later, graduates of a philosophy department at Peking University told me that Feng Youlan, in giving them a lecture, admitted that although he did not fully agree with Guan Feng’s view, he thought Guan Feng was the highest among all critics of his article. From March to June 1966, when I was on secondment to Hongqi Magazine, Guan Feng was the magazine’s Philosophical History Leader. Once we go to the canteen to eat a few people together, a “red flag” magazine staff, pointing to a small and a bit humpback middle-aged